Skip navigation
View Cart

Road Design

Cover of Road Cross-section Design for Road Stereotypes (including Network Safety Plans) and a Safe System
Road Cross-section Design for Road Stereotypes (including Network Safety Plans) and a Safe System
  • Publication no: AP-R618-20
  • ISBN: 978-1-925854-97-8
  • Published: 18 May 2020

This report summarises activities undertaken to produce guidance on road cross-section design for road stereotypes during stage 1 and 2 of this project. The guidance enables road managers, planners and designers to achieve improved safety outcomes by applying consistent standards along a road corridor.

Thirteen road stereotypes were identified covering rural and urban roads ranging from freeways/motorways to local access roads. For each stereotype, a range of cross-sections was developed with appropriate attributes. Each cross-section was assessed for crash risk using the International Road Assessment Program (iRAP) and the Australian National Risk Assessment Model (ANRAM).

The tables provide guidance on the expected safety performance, or crash risk, of appropriate cross‑section options for each stereotype. Note that the range of attribute dimensions in the assessment was very limited, so assessment results should be considered as an indication of the safety benefits for the nominated attributes.

This information can be used to develop safety improvement plans on a network/corridor, to reduce crash risk on the network. Network/corridor plans can then inform project scoping decisions.

View the webinar about the guidance.

  • Summary
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1 Background
    • 1.2 Objectives
    • 1.3 Scope
  • 2. Literature Review
    • 2.1 Assessment Methods
      • 2.1.1 Australian National Risk Assessment Model (ANRAM)
      • 2.1.2 Star Rating Standard (iRAP)
      • 2.1.3 Highway Safety Manual
    • 2.2 Preferred Crash Risk Assessment Methods
  • 3. Consultation with Jurisdictions
  • 4. Key Design Considerations for Stereotypes
    • 4.1 Road Networks
    • 4.2 Principles for Improving a Road Network
    • 4.3 Design Principles
      • 4.3.1 Self-explaining Road
      • 4.3.2 Safe System
      • 4.3.3 Road Function and Movement and Place
      • 4.3.4 Other Design Principles
    • 4.4 Road Design Competence in the Network-wide Design
  • 5. Development of Road Stereotype Tables
    • 5.1 Road Function and Movement and Place
    • 5.2 Road Stereotypes
    • 5.3 Road Stereotype Attributes
    • 5.4 Road Stereotypes Summary
    • 5.5 Greenfield or Brownfield Sites
    • 5.6 Design Considerations
    • 5.7 Cross-section Attributes
    • 5.8 Crash Risk Assessment
      • 5.8.1 ANRAM
      • 5.8.2 Star Rating Standard (iRAP)
    • 5.9 Anomalies
    • 5.10 Development of Intersection Tables
      • 5.10.1 Types of Intersections
  • 6. Feedback from Trials
    • 6.1 Development of Training Materials
    • 6.2 New South Wales Trial
    • 6.3 Sensitivity Analysis for Intersection Tables
  • 7. Final Process to Assign Stereotypes
    • 7.1 Detailed Procedure
      • 7.1.1 Step 1: Preliminary Information Required
      • 7.1.2 Step 2: Collect the Data for each Corridor/Link
      • 7.1.3 Step 3: Identify the Road Stereotype Table
      • 7.1.4 Step 4: Consider Safer (Treatment) Cross-sections for each Funding Scenario
      • 7.1.5 Step 5: Recommend Corridor Standards
    • 7.2 User Guide
  • 8. Further Investigation
  • 9. Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendix A Literature Review Summary
  • Appendix B Consultation
    • B.1 Workshop Participants
    • B.2 Presentation Slides
    • B.3 Workshop Handout
    • B.4 City of Salisbury Map
    • B.5 Blacktown City Council Map
  • Appendix C Road Stereotypes Tables
  • Appendix D Intersection Stereotype Tables
  • Appendix E Fatal and Serious Injury Crash Costs
    • E.1 Willingness-to-pay
    • E.2 Human Capital
  • Appendix F Progress Reports
    • F.1 Progress Report 1
    • F.2 Progress Report 2
    • F.3 Progress Report 3
    • F.4 Progress Report 4
Related publications
Network Design for Road Safety (Stereotypes for Cross-sections and Intersections): User Guide
AP-R619-20
View all related publications
Latest Road Design News
18 Aug 2023
A ‘push-pull’ approach to minimise jurisdictional supplements to Austroads Guide to Road Design

Austroads has reviewed jurisdictional practices of developing supplements to its Guide to Road Design and devised a process that will reduce the need for supplements. This includes a pathway for adding supplement material to the Guide.
1 Jun 2023
New road design guidance on intersections, crossings, roundabouts and interchanges

Austroads has updated its Guide to Road Design part 4 series and the Design Vehicles and Turning Path Templates Guide providing contemporary intersection design guidance based on best-practice evidence to improve road safety.
View all news