Active Travel
- Publication no: AP-R493-15
- ISBN: 978-1-925294-73-6
- Published: 23 September 2015
- PDF (free) Download
This report documents the bicycle directional signage and wayfinding systems currently in use in seven major cycling nations and in seven Australian and New Zealand jurisdictions. It provides a detailed analysis of the way directional signs are used in these jurisdictions studying issues such as: relevant guidelines; sign types; layout and design of signs (including colour and typeface); route branding and numbering; marking of named facilities; the use of map signs; pavement markings for wayfinding assistance; sign system planning methodology; sign mounting systems; innovative and useful sign applications and other implementation issues.
Recommendations for updating directional sign guidelines have been published in a separate report AP-R492-15 Bicycle Wayfinding.
- Summary
- 1. Project Background
- 2. Key Signage and Wayfinding Issues Investigated
- 2.1. Coverage of individual sign systems in this review
- 2.2. Increasing the range of travel by signing for bicycle networks
- 2.3. Background information and signage principles
- 2.3.1. Conspicuity
- 2.3.2. Legibility
- 2.3.3. Coherence
- 2.3.4. Function
- 2.4. Signage categories covered by this review
- 2.4.1. Signage guidelines
- 2.4.2. Sign design
- 2.4.3. Sign types
- 2.4.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 2.4.5. Use of map signs
- 2.4.6. Associated pavement markings
- 2.4.7. Applications
- 2.4.8. Signage system planning methodology
- 2.4.9. Sign mounting systems
- 2.4.10. Implementation issues
- 3. International Signage Systems
- 3.1. General issues
- 3.2. Denmark
- 3.2.1. Signage guidelines
- 3.2.2. Sign design
- 3.2.3. Sign types
- 3.2.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 3.2.5. Supercykelstier/Cycle Super Highways
- 3.2.6. Use of map signs
- 3.2.7. Associated pavement markings
- 3.2.8. Applications
- 3.2.9. Signage system planning methodology
- 3.2.10. Sign mounting systems
- 3.2.11. Implementation issues
- 3.3. France
- 3.3.1. Signage guidelines
- 3.3.2. Sign design
- 3.3.3. Sign types
- 3.3.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 3.3.5. Use of map signs
- 3.3.6. Associated pavement markings
- 3.3.7. Applications
- 3.3.8. Signage system planning methodology
- 3.3.9. Sign mounting systems
- 3.3.10. Implementation issues
- 3.4. Germany
- 3.4.1. Signage guidelines
- 3.4.2. Sign design
- 3.4.3. Sign types
- 3.4.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 3.4.5. Use of map signs
- 3.4.6. Associated pavement markings
- 3.4.7. Applications
- 3.4.8. Signage system planning methodology
- 3.4.9. Sign mounting systems
- 3.4.10. Implementation issues
- 3.5. Netherlands
- 3.5.1. Signage guidelines
- 3.5.2. Sign design
- 3.5.3. Sign types
- 3.5.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 3.5.5. Use of map signs
- 3.5.6. Associated pavement markings
- 3.5.7. Applications
- 3.5.8. Signage system planning methodology
- 3.5.9. Sign mounting systems
- 3.5.10. Implementation issues
- 3.6. United Kingdom
- 3.6.1. Signage guidelines
- 3.6.2. Sign design
- 3.6.3. Sign types
- 3.6.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 3.6.5. Use of map signs
- 3.6.6. Associated pavement markings
- 3.6.7. Applications
- 3.6.8. Signage system planning methodology
- 3.6.9. Sign mounting systems
- 3.6.10. Implementation issues
- 3.7. United States of America
- 3.7.1. Signage guidelines
- 3.7.2. Sign design
- 3.7.3. Sign types
- 3.7.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 3.7.5. Use of map signs
- 3.7.6. Associated pavement markings
- 3.7.7. Applications
- 3.7.8. Signage system planning methodology
- 3.7.9. Sign mounting systems
- 3.7.10. Implementation issues
- 3.8. Switzerland
- 3.8.1. Signage guidelines
- 3.8.2. Sign design
- 3.8.3. Sign types
- 3.8.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 3.8.5. Use of map signs
- 3.8.6. Associated pavement markings
- 3.8.7. Applications
- 3.8.8. Signage system planning methodology
- 3.8.9. Sign mounting systems
- 3.8.10. Implementation issues
- 3.9. Other countries
- 3.9.1. Signage of EuroVelo routes across multiple countries and sign systems
- 3.9.2. Sweden
- 3.9.3. Norway
- 3.9.4. Italy
- 4. Australia & New Zealand Signage Systems
- 4.1. General issues
- 4.2. Australian Standard AS1742.9
- 4.2.1. Signage guidelines
- 4.2.2. Sign design
- 4.2.3. Sign types
- 4.2.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 4.2.5. Use of map signs
- 4.2.6. Associated pavement markings
- 4.2.7. Applications
- 4.2.8. Signage system planning
- 4.2.9. Sign mounting systems
- 4.2.10. Implementation issues
- 4.3. Australian Capital Territory
- 4.3.1. Signage guidelines
- 4.3.2. Sign design
- 4.3.3. Sign types
- 4.3.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 4.3.5. Use of map signs
- 4.3.6. Associated pavement markings
- 4.3.7. Applications
- 4.3.8. Signage system planning
- 4.3.9. Sign mounting systems
- 4.3.10. Implementation issues
- 4.4. New South Wales
- 4.4.1. Signage guidelines
- 4.4.2. Sign design
- 4.4.3. Sign types
- 4.4.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 4.4.5. Use of map signs
- 4.4.6. Associated pavement markings
- 4.4.7. Applications
- 4.4.8. Signage system planning
- 4.4.9. Sign mounting systems
- 4.4.10. Implementation issues
- 4.5. Queensland
- 4.5.1. Signage guidelines
- 4.5.2. Sign design
- 4.5.3. Sign types
- 4.5.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 4.5.5. Use of map signs
- 4.5.6. Associated pavement markings
- 4.5.7. Applications
- 4.5.8. Signage system planning
- 4.5.9. Sign mounting systems
- 4.5.10. Implementation issues
- 4.6. Western Australia
- 4.6.1. Signage guidelines
- 4.6.2. Sign design
- 4.6.3. Sign types
- 4.6.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 4.6.5. Use of map signs
- 4.6.6. Associated pavement markings
- 4.6.7. Applications
- 4.6.8. Signage system planning
- 4.6.9. Sign mounting systems
- 4.6.10. Implementation issues
- 4.7. New Zealand
- 4.7.1. Signage guidelines
- 4.7.2. Sign design
- 4.7.3. Sign types
- 4.7.4. Branded, numbered or named routes
- 4.7.5. Use of map signs
- 4.7.6. Associated pavement markings
- 4.7.7. Applications
- 4.7.8. Signage system planning
- 4.7.9. Sign mounting systems
- 4.7.10. Implementation issues
- 5. Recent Developments in ANZ Signage Systems
- 5.1. Victoria – Bicycle Wayfinding Working Group
- 5.2. Tasmania
- 5.3. City of Sydney Council
- 5.4. City of Adelaide bicycle routes
- 5.5. Brisbane City Council
- 5.6. Rail Trails Australia
- 5.7. Christchurch City Council
- 6. Key Issues for Further Consideration
- 6.1. Use of colour
- 6.2. Typeface and use of capitalisation
- 6.3. Lettering size and legibility
- 6.4. Sign types and route hierarchy
- 6.5. User symbols on directional signs
- 6.6. Depiction of distance and the use of travel times
- 6.7. Route numbering, branding and naming
- 6.8. Retroreflectivity issues
- 6.9. Sign system planning
- 6.10. Detour signage
- 6.11. Sign mounting issues
- 6.12. Existing signage investment
- References
- International Jurisdictions
- Australian Jurisdictions